From Sensory Memory to Multilingual Pedagogy

CLIL+i – Content·Language·Identity Learning

Origin and Vision

CLIL+i emerged from the need to expand the traditional CLIL model beyond competence and performance.
In multilingual classrooms, language is not only a medium of instruction but also a mirror of belonging, migration, and imagination.
CLIL+i introduces the missing dimension: identity. It invites learners to inhabit language as a creative and aesthetic space — to think, feel, and build knowledge through the plurality of their voices.

Core Principles

The “+ i” stands for identity, inclusion, and interdisciplinarity. In CLIL+i, art becomes the laboratory of language: visual form and verbal expression are interwoven until they illuminate one another.
Students work bilingually or multilingually — English, German, and heritage languages coexist as equal instruments of thought.
The aim is not perfect linguistic accuracy, but authentic articulation:
to discover how language carries memory, shapes perception, and opens dialogue across cultures.

Pedagogical Framework

CLIL+i lessons follow a project-based, multimodal structure. Each unit integrates:

  • conceptual exploration of art topics;

  • bilingual research and technical terminology (Fachsprache) scaffolding through sentence starters and visual organizers;

  • creative production

  • reflective writing in which students analyze their artistic and linguistic decisions.

Assessment values precision of thought, compositional awareness, and reflective depth rather than linguistic conformity.
The classroom becomes a multilingual environment — a site where language learning, artistic practice, and self-formation converge.

Impact and Research

First implemented in upper-secondary Art classes at a Berlin Gymnasium, CLIL+i has shown remarkable results: 93 % of students reported improvement in their English skills, and 64 % wished to experience CLIL in other subjects.
Their projects demonstrate that when language and identity are treated as resources, learning becomes personal, global, and intellectually alive.
The architecture-based CLIL+i unit was published in Kunst + Unterricht (495/496, 2025).

Curriculum as Artistic Research

What would later take shape as CLIL-based curriculum design was, at its core, rooted in artistic research. It began during my Master’s studies in France, where I explored how identity takes form in art.

My thesis L’intime à l’œuvre (Sorbonne, Paris, 2010) examined practices that intertwine autobiography, memory, and sensory experience — from Eva Hesse, Christian Boltanski to Pina Bausch and Maya Deren. The final chapter traced my own process: an installation built around scent, tactility, and visual storytelling as a memory-based practice of resistance and reconstruction.

Years later, during my teacher training in Berlin, this conceptual nucleus became the foundation of my bilingual teaching. My Modulprüfung thesis asked: Inwiefern kann, in einem bilingualen Kunstunterricht, das Arbeiten in der Fremdsprache die Funktion der Bildenden Kunst kulturelle Vielfalt zu vermitteln?

The early CLIL unit — designed and taught in a Gymnasium — marked the beginning of my formal curriculum-building. But the story had already started — in a different building, through a different medium.